Sunday, June 15, 2008

SPOILERS OF THE LOST ARK - Part Two


PART ONE was one of the Rocket Blog’s most controversial articles ever!  You’ve been waiting all week and now the second & final chapter of Rocket Video's Joe Fontes, epic beat-down of the new Indiana Jones

flick is upon us.

This point-by-point, scene-for-scene dissection of The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull may one day prove to be the Holly Grail of hate documents. If you want to see a grown man boil with pure abomination and anger toward a stupid movie, then look no further, until his contempt finally becomes a thing of beauty....


So here is PART TWO (of two) of Joe Fontes' 

SPOILERS OF THE LOST ARK.... 



Okay, so back to the story.  

Now we’re in South America looking for someone that the audience has never seen before to help some kid who Indy doesn’t know is secretly his son, despite the best efforts of members of my audience group yelling it at the screen as soon as he rides on screen.   

We are taken to a convent/asylum where the mystery guy used to live. We use the same trick we did in the third movie and put the big “X” on the floor to tell us where to go next. That’s all we get from this scene.  

We still don’t know who we’re looking for. And by now, I don’t care. 

But we go someplace into the jungle to find something. Only it’s not really a jungle it’s a sound stage.  

And what do we find at the first sign of the makings of archaeology in the movie?  Ninjas. In “South America”. Not cool, Indy.  

But after breezing by two of them in a completely blasé manner (he may actually have cracked the whip at them, I’m not 100% certain, I was rubbing my eyes to make sure I was really seeing ninjas), we enter the tomb of some dead conquistador.  

Oh yeah, and there may have been a booby trap. One. 

And it was not so much a life threatening obstacle as a tilting fulcrum. I’m serious.  

He leans on the far side and it tilts. It doesn’t tilt him over a pit of piranhas.  

It just tilts. Not cool, Indy. So now that we have narrowly escaped “leaving empty handed”, we find another terrific magnetic force coming from behind the dead Spaniard’s corpse.  What could this be?  

And once we move the dead guy, all the metal in the room starts to move toward the magnetic crystal alien skull. Because, of course, bones and mummified remains block extremely powerful magnetic attraction. 

And then Indy determines that this place is not the skull’s original resting place and it must have been brought by our mystery boy. Because that’s what archaeologists do… bury stuff from one impossible to find location, in another impossible to find location.  

But just as the B.S. flag is reaching half mast, Indy and Mutt get captured coming out of the first “hidden location”.  

It’s Indy’s traitor buddy, Winstone, and he’s taking them to meet the “not necessarily bad, but definitely not on our side” guys.  At least the same ones we met at the beginning of the movie.  

That’s right, no new bad guys. No surprises. Except that we now get to meet the mystery boy. And other than knowing the actor John Hurt, I still have no idea who the heck this guy is. Not that I’m working hard to figure it out, because quite frankly it’s not interesting enough to hold my attention. It is obvious from his character’s appearance, that he is meant to be very old and decrepit.  

I am firmly of the belief that his character was originally written as Abner Ravenwood, Marion’s father. Despite the fact that John hurt is only two years older than Harrison Ford, his make-up paints a different picture.  

And the line Indy delivers to him saying, “She’s Abner’s little girl,” only makes me think they quickly rewrote “She’s your little girl.”  

But of course they probably felt that having said he was dead in the first film, it would take a lot of explaining. Oh sweet Lord!  You should have explained it! Anything to make me give a rat’s behind about this idiot! I think I would have at least cared a little bit about him if he was someone I’d heard of. He’s supposed to be someone that Indy cares enough about to fly to another continent to protect. So why do I not know him? 

 I’ve known Indy for 27 years!  I think if this guy’s that important, he would have at least been brought up in the fifteen minutes before I find out he’s been kidnapped.  

Instead he gets lumped in with Jim Broadbent as another pointless character.  

But to return to the point, this “friend” has lost his mind. Or at least he’s acting differently than everyone who “knows” him is used to. 

But since we’ve never seen or heard from him before, the audience isn’t noticeably affected by his “sudden” mania.  

So we’ve been brought here to save this lunatic from some mildly irritating people who don’t even seem to have hurt him. They haven’t tied him up or anything. 

In fact when we first see him, he’s dancing with them around a fire. 

It looks like camping, not captivity.  


But wait, is Cate going to torture Indy?  

Could this be the opportunity to show us how tough he is?  

No she just makes him look into the eyes of this crystal skull. This isn’t the least bit scary, by the way. He winces a little and then the Cate covers the skull with a cloth, thus rendering it inert. 

No, really. She just drops a towel on it and that’s it. Where’s the evil?  

The Soviets were the “Red Menace”, right?  So why aren’t they menacing?  

I know they’re not the Nazis. And I know that Russia is our friend now, but are we trying to say that they’re not really bad people, they just got a bad rap for the whole “Communism” shtick?  

You know, we are in South America… didn’t the Nazis hide Hitler’s clone down there?  Come on, Steven, you can bring the Nazis back.  I won’t mind. I promise. I’d like to at least have someone with an evil laugh. 

Sorry, folks, we’re stuck with the Minsk Milquetoasts.  

So then the reds threaten to hurt Mutt, and Indy says, “So what?”  

BECAUSE HE STILL DOESN’T KNOW HE’S HIS SON! 

So they bring him out of the “torture-less” tent and say they have someone he does care about. Who could this be?  

Do you think it could be Marion?  

It better be Marion because if they expect me to care about another character I have never met before, I might just cry… no, thankfully, it’s Marion.  

MARION!  Yay!  

Everybody in the theater goes wild! Thankfully covering up the hopelessly stupid line of dialogue she says when she WALKS out of the tent… unimpeded by handcuffs, not tied to a stake slowly rotating over a seething pit of lava, not even gagged… unfortunately.  

It even looks like they’re keeping her well fed. Sorry, couldn’t help it. She “Randal’s” out of the tent casually, and they are instantly re-smitten. No sexual tension. Just release. It’s been twenty years and everything’s forgotten. Not even a wisp of a fight.  Not cool, Indy.  Not cool.

So now, after showing him that they are at least closer to Marion than he is (since she’s obviously not under any semblance of duress), Indy is willing to help the Commies with their plan to find the other lost place.  


I’ve already forgotten where it was or why they were going there, it’s so inconsequential.  

In fact, Indy doesn’t even care at this point. He starts unfolding maps and smiling with the “Reds”. He’s in a great mood. He’s back with the girl from the first movie.  He’s joined the festivities, just like every other person the Soviets have interacted with in this movie. Why should he care about anything else?  

The audience sure doesn’t. The movie’s already over for us. The two people we wanted to see on screen together again are together again and happy. We can all go home and forget about the rest of the movie, right?  

Yes. You can, and you should.  

If you have made it this far into the film and not walked out, now is your chance. The rest of this film is pointless. Nothing else interesting happens from here on in… if you were interested in anything so far.  

But unfortunately, there is still more.  

Despite the fact that Indy and everybody else seems to be riding off into the off-color sunset, Mutt is unhappy. He doesn’t like the idea of helping the Commies, so he starts a fight and grabs the gang for a pursuit through the jungle, albeit a quick one.  

Because fifteen seconds after they leave the campsite, Indy and Marion get stuck in quicksand. 

The “psycho”, whose name I haven’t a reason to remember, gets sent to look for something to help get them out, and Mutt runs off too.  

This may be the only scene I liked in the entire movie.  We get a rundown of the last twenty years without each other.  Marion tells Indy that Mutt is his son.  Indy gets a laugh with the “why didn’t he finish school?” gag that’s been building since we met the kid.  It’s a nice moment.  

Then Mutt brings back a snake. Mutt keeps throwing the snake to Indy to grab onto to pull him out. It goes on for about five seconds too long with the “call it something else” bit, but it’s still a fun scene that works on all the levels it attempts.  

And then the “psycho nut-ball” guy comes back with the “bad” guys as “help”. And the one good scene is over, and we go back to camp.  

We move immediately to the prolonged “actually-effective” escape sequence. This felt like half the movie, and it’s probably where all the money went. 

It’s a long car chase through the jungle just like the first movie, with Indy getting loose and throwing the driver of the truck in which they are being held, out of the window.  Then he frees the others and they try to escape. This one continuous scene is ridiculous, over the top and only serves the plot-wise purpose of separating Indy and the gang from the Commies by about a fifteen minute head start. 

The whole thing is obviously CGI and lacks any tangible action.  

It all feels like they realized halfway through the script that they forgot to add an action sequence, and this was the only place they could fit one in. And since this is an “action movie” it has to be sizeable.  

But frankly this is pointless overkill. Almost the entire sequence is shot with a crane in a green screen room. After Indy takes the wheel, the film shifts to the studio. The camera moves impossibly in between the cars and through the trees.  

There are shots on cliff-sides that are incredulous and unnecessary.  


But do not let me forget the most egregious sequence in film history.  

This malapropism is so terrible, it actually affects my love of another completely unrelated film.  I shall explain.  

My favorite Charlie Chaplin movie is The Circus.  

In one scene in that film, the Tramp is trying to impress the girl he loves by taking the place of the tightrope walker that she admires. Through a series of insane events, several monkeys are let loose into the tent where the Tramp is performing. These monkeys climb all over him, biting his nose and ears and covering his eyes, as he dances deftly on the high wire. It is possibly one of the funniest moments captured on film. 

And Shia LeBeouf ruined it.  

To be fair, he is not attempting to copy this trick, he is actually trying to play Tarzan… in an Indiana Jones movie. But the result is offensive. 

Didn’t anyone learn from Peter Jackson’s King Kong that primates aren’t funny anymore? Yes, I include humans as primates, since that movie also rent the “funny” from Jack Black

This sequence with Mutt swinging from vines as if he suddenly remembered some latent talent, long suppressed, is a travesty and should be removed from any further versions of this movie.  

Since George and Steven are apt to change their films for video release anyway, I make this simple plea. Removing this scene from the DVD might actually make up for the “no guns in E.T. / Greedo shot first” debacles. Almost. But it’s worth a try, you two, even if I don’t forgive you.  

So, back to the action sequence.  We have the obligatory sword fight since poor Cate’s been carrying it around for the last hour and a half.  

Oh yeah, and Shia mentioned he fenced, despite the fact he seems infatuated with his switchblade. The sword fight is more slapstick than action. In fact, the whole bit is literally a series of sticks slapping Shia in the crotch. It has to be one of the most awkward scenes I’ve ever seen. It isn’t funny. It doesn’t strengthen the action or add to the precarious nature of the fight. I think it might be to show how ‘tough’ Mutt is supposed to be… maybe? 

I’m at a loss for a reasonable explanation. 

And this portion of the scene lasts an uncomfortably long time. The perplexed look on my face while writing this should be entered as an illustration.  

So Shia gets to fight Cate, because Harrison Ford doesn’t actually get to fight the main “bad” guy in the movie because she isn’t bad enough. Ford doesn’t get to sleep with her either, despite the fact that they hired a ridiculously attractive woman to play his antagonist. He does however get to fight the “heavy”, who eventually gets eaten by ants, because they’ve run out of cool ways to kill people and we’ve already recycled enough of the other plot devices from the first three movies, in a vain attempt to simply allude to them.  

Oh yeah, he loses his hat once, but catches it when the ants try to carry it away, because this is a family film and ants making off with a hat that can’t be removed by a nuclear blast is funny, right? 

No. Not funny. Not cool.


But we still aren’t finished. Marion mysteriously disappears with one of the cars into the jungle for ten minutes of this sequence, only to reappear when the fighting is over, to perform the most cartoon-like move I have ever seen in a live-action movie. 

Despite this being a Paramount film, they borrow directly from a Warner Bros. cartoon and drop a car from a cliff onto a tree that bends down to dip the car, unscratched, into the water; and then the limb lashes back to whip the “bad” guys that are hanging on the edge of the cliff. 

This doesn’t count as using a whip, you guys. Not cool, Indy.  

So now we’re in the water and we have a ridiculously tired waterfall gag… three times.  Steven, if I sigh at the first one, why are there three?  

And what happened to the miniatures and the real waterfalls?  

This whole thing was done in a computer. The best part of the first three movies is that there weren’t any computer graphics. They used camera tricks and stunts. This movie feels like it’s trying to be so big, it couldn’t possibly be made for real. 

So, quite frankly, it doesn’t feel real. And it doesn’t look real. I got totally sucked into the earlier movies because they felt real.  

In Crusade there really was a flaming fuselage speeding past Indy and his dad when they drove through that tunnel. I saw it. It was on fire and that pilot looked over at the two of them as he went by… on fire!  

But not a single person went over that waterfall. 

I know it. I saw it. It was fake. That hurt.  Not cool, Indy.


So now we have an entire city hidden behind the nostril of some skull carved out of the waterfall face. They move ten, maybe twenty feet into the cave past the waterfall and suddenly, a wall breaks and they walk out into a large open mesa.  

Didn’t they just fall down three waterfalls?  

Couldn’t they see this from the top? 

Are they still underground? 

How can we see the sky then?  

What just happened?  

I don’t know, and we don’t stop to find out, because now we are being chased by a thousand inept Mayans or Aztecs or maybe it’s more ninjas. But the “psycho” mystery guy pulls out the skull and the pursuers run away.  

So then they climb this hill and open the top of the pyramid and go down into a circular room with a bunch of shiny dead aliens. No really, that’s it. It happens that fast and it’s just as pointless.  

But they’re not alone, because the Commies are right behind them. And the five of them left with machine guns are enough to kill the thousand or so native ninjas with absolutely no fanfare. 

I’m giving this load of wasted opportunity its own paragraph.

I just remembered a very important plot device that should be told before I go further.  Ray Winstone’s character is actually a “good guy” who was using the “bad” guys to catch up with Indy. Except that he isn’t really a “good” guy because he reneges and sides with the “bad” guys again but in the end he forgets both sides and just tries to steal stuff from the treasure room the aliens have in the pyramid.  

Oh yeah, and he dies when he shows that he’s really just selfish.  

This may be the largest sum of money paid to an actor who serves no purpose whatsoever, in movie history… this film breaks a lot of new ground for such a colossal waste of time.  

It’s not Ray’s fault. He was probably just happy to be asked to work on such a cool “sounding” project. But I’m not really sure what the character is meant to accomplish.  To say, “he has no arc” would be to imply he actually progresses with no resolution, but this character doesn’t actually do anything.  

He doesn’t help Indy when he is on his side and he doesn’t help the Commies while siding with them. He doesn’t have any good lines. He doesn’t get to reveal something that only he knows. He doesn’t get any fight scenes. In fact, I can’t honestly remember where he is during the whole action sequence extravaganza. Or even which side he is on, during it.  

The only things I can remember him saying are “Sorry, I’m with them,” and “I tried to tell you I was on your side, but you weren’t listening”. And his death scene is remarkably ambiguous. Even after serious thought, I still don’t understand why he says what he says. He tells Indy not to worry about him. They have a moment and then he goes off to get more treasure he can’t possibly carry away. He is going deeper into the temple, and he knows it is falling down around him. 

I’m at a loss.  


So at last we come to the biggest disappointment in the entire film… this far.  Remember the shiny aliens in the big room in the pyramid?  Aliens. I’m not kidding.  

Yes, we are still in an Indiana Jones movie. And there are aliens.  

Yes, this sucks just as much as you think it does. It turns out that the only Archaeology in the film was really done by the aliens prior to filming and they have unearthed a treasure room bigger than any museum. So really, Indy serves no purpose in any of his normal capacities here. He hasn’t found anything that the “nutball” didn’t find earlier.  

And the aliens he was asked to analyze ten years ago turn out to be better at his job than he is. So not cool, Indy.  

So the “psycho” regains his sanity when confronted with shiny alien skeletons, because, let me assure you, it’s a pretty sobering sight. Even if you’re drunk on the “action” so far, this is definitely a cold hard slap in the face. Any delusion you might have had about this still turning out to be a movie about Archaeology are now gone.  This is not Indy IV, it’s Close Encounters II: of the Stupid kind.  

The director even uses the same aliens.

 So actually I guess this could be a prequel, chronologically speaking. Spielberg has managed to turn his entire career into a Mobius strip in one swift, deft motion. 

But just to make sure we aren’t confused enough by his insertion of aliens into an archaeology movie, he explains they aren’t really from another planet, but another dimension. Really?  

How does that make it closer to an Archaeology themed movie? Who cares?  

This was officially a bad idea. I know you surround yourself with a lot of people who are happy to make the money you pay them; so let me be the first to tell you:  

This was a mistake.  

Not just making them extra-dimensional, not just making them look like the first aliens in a movie you also made, but by putting aliens into this magnificent universe you created that, until now, only reaffirmed religious hope in a morally bankrupt world.  

In three other movies, you had showed us that even without the direct power of a god that the things that people give holy power to, hold onto those powers. No matter what anyone’s religion. A Hebrew God. A Hindu God. A Christian God. You made all human faith seem possible. You made us believe in the powers of something we couldn’t see.  You never made judgment. You showed us possibility. There was still the mystery. There was still the need for faith

But here you show us an “alien”.  

You tell us their power and you show us how they came and how they left. There is no mystery.  There are no questions. You show us evidence and leave us with facts.  Regardless of what other religions say, this cult of belief, in the jungles of South America, are right. You prove it. You show us their God. 

Problem solved.  

I don’t need to go to church anymore. I should just go to South America and wait for the aliens to come back. Thanks Steven. Now use my ten dollars to pay someone else to make you feel better, because I don’t like you anymore. 

 

Sorry to get a little mean there.  I guess I should get back to lighter things I didn’t like.  Let’s talk about what everyone else is talking about. The wedding. 

That’s right. In case someone else didn’t already ruin it for you, I will.  

Indy marries Marion.  What a gyp!  

First off, there is absolutely no chemistry between the two of them in this movie. There are several obviously faked longing looks passed between the two of them, but the kissing looks like they’re related by blood, and this actually causes physical pain in their loins to be touching lips like this.  

I had heard that they really didn’t hit it off while filming the first movie, but this looked awful. I believed that they never tried to contact each other for twenty years. I was not remotely convinced by this film that they would end up together. 

When Mutt keeps them from kissing in the pyramid, they look relieved.  

I thought the follow-up line should have been, “Next time, stop this sooner!”  

And why would you end with this wedding scene. It puts a cap on such an odd action frenzy of a film that only “bottles-in” the confusion it tops.  

John Hurt’s line about wasted time seems to be a thematic explanation, but to what?  The movie hasn’t been about that.  

The series of movies weren’t about that. 

And then they make what seems to be a closing statement into a prelude by showing us Mutt trying to put the hat on.  

Indy’s line of “Not this time,” is probably the scariest thing in the whole movie. 

I covered my eyes when I thought they might show a flash forward of “Mutt Jones and the Diner of the Flaming Virgins” or whatever money-fueled stupidity Steven and George have implied with that line.


What this movie should have been is a short one-reeler containing the snake/rope scene and the first kiss between Indy and Marion in twenty years (Except that it should be a convincing one. Didn’t they pay you two enough to act?).  

Two minutes. Clean. Simple. Cheap.  Same result… except without the seething hatred inspired by the destruction of some of my fondest childhood memories.  

So next time, just make something new. 

You can cash in on your success by making another movie together, just don’t tack it on to the end of one your good movies.  

Use your imagination. It is supposed to be the only inexhaustible source of energy in the world…  just don’t make a movie about how you screw that up too.  

Better luck next time.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

SPOILERS OF THE LOST ARK - Part One


Rocket Video's Joe Fontes, tosses his two cents into the Indiana Jones beat-down arena
And frankly his epic point-by-point, scene-for-scene dissection of the flick proves way more entertaining then the crappy movie that those two bearded Yoda nerds gave us. 
This essay he has bestowed upon us, may one day prove to be the Holly Grail of Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull hate documents.
So here is PART ONE (of two) of Joe Fontes' 
SPOILERS OF THE LOST ARK.... 

Most people will be surprised to hear such vehement nonsense coming from me.

That is unless of course you have had the misfortune to see me in the week since I saw, what I can only pray to be, the last installment of the Indiana Jones franchise

For those unlucky dozens I have unsolicitedly assaulted with my feelings, I apologize. 

This document is for those I have yet to reach. And to you, as well, I offer my sincerest condolences.  Especially to those of you I haven’t reached in time.  


Let me begin by saying simply this:  

DO NOT WATCH “INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL.


I suppose most, if not all, of you will ask, “Why?” 

What follows will with all certainty contain what is known in the vernacular as SPOILERS. But rest assured, reading my berating and scathing commentary will not “spoil” this movie any more than the Crew & Cast of Spielberg’s latest steaming hot… wait, let’s not get angry.

It has been a week now and I am still a little miffed. So I will try to be as calm as possible and not let “nostalgia” cloud my judgment. 


Let’s begin with the broad strokes.  

THE SCRIPT: 

This script has been legendarily toiled over for at least ten years. George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, and Harrison Ford have all consented to the filming of this long awaited version. All three of them were touting how wonderful it finally had become.  

They were wrong. 

This dialogue makes The Phantom Menace look like Citizen Kane

 Every single word that comes from every single character is poorly written. And, rest assured, the actors know it. It seems as if every actor had taken Harrison Ford’s “How to Make Making Faces Look Like Acting” Course. 

The only person who even really seems engaged by his character’s actions is Shia LaBeouf. This poor kid is completely convincing, in what he had hoped to be the role of his career. I never doubt for a second that he is a high school dropout whose only marketable skill is a preternatural gift for fixing motorcycles. He is certainly more convincing than my mechanic. 

It is no wonder that after countless drafts and contributors, only one screenwriter agreed to attach his name to this. I can only hope that in ten years this will mark the one dark spot in a long list of award winners. But I seriously doubt it. Sorry, David Koepp, but I don’t hold much hope for your remake of The Taking of Pelham 123, I’ve seen Panic Room. You should stop while you still have money.

The dialogue is not even remotely the only problem with the film.  

The director, as well as the screenwriter, seems to have forgotten the formula that made the other three movies work so well. The pacing and overall setup of the original three movies had a rhythm and an ordered system that simply worked. 

The opening sequence is “just the beginning”, except in this movie where we find out the “surprise ending” of the film two minutes into it.  

In the previous three movies, we were introduced to a man that made Archaeology look exciting and dangerous, and most importantly, cool.  

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I submit that this is not an easy task. This is a difficult science that is time consuming, research-heavy, and only rarely produces tangible results, let alone sexy ones. But this man, this “Indiana Jones”, changed that forever in the minds of people around the world. And he did it in the first fifteen minutes of the first movie. And the first fifteen minutes of the second movie, which included a musical number in a foreign language. And he even did it as a teenage boy scout in the first fifteen minutes of the third movie.  


So let’s take a look at the opening sequence of the fourth movie.  

First I must offer a warning to whoever came up with the Paramount logo dissolve in this film. I won’t come looking for you, but if I ever happen to meet you and discover that it was your idea to make me think I had mistakenly sat down in the theater showing Caddyshack 3, I will flay the skin from your flesh and roast you on a pit in my backyard. I swear by all things holy, I was expecting a Kenny Loggins’ song to swell up and the prairie dog to start dancing. Luckily that didn’t happen until after the nuclear blast.  

So once I got past that, I was immediately reminded of George Lucas’ involvement in the picture by the hot-rod “race” scene. Not only did this not serve any purpose, other than to evoke a sense of nostalgia for American Graffiti, but it wasn’t even a believable race. The hot-rod kids pull up next to the lead car in this caravan of military vehicles and rev their engine. The lead car returns in kind, and they’re off... in close up.  Every interlaced wide shot of the caravan with the hot-rod next to it had no discernable change in the distance between the lead car and the rest of the vehicles in the caravan. What happened to the race?  

Did all of the trucks accelerate along with the lead car? 

Is this formation driving? 

Of course the whole premise is negated two minutes later when we learn that the driver of the lead car, along with every other uniformed person in the caravan, is Russian. Was drag racing a big draw in the Communist Soviet Union?  

Was Rebel Without a Cause even released over there? 

 Were Russian kids racing their farm animals in the snow up there?  

How do you supercharge a goat?  

But I digress. We then break from the exciting fun of fifties “hop” music, to turn onto a Military road. 

The Atomic Café sign was a nice touch, but the sign for the base says “Hangar 51”. 

Firstly, the correct terminology in this fictitious lore was Hangar 18 of Area 51.  

Secondly, no Air Force base has a gate that leads to just one hangar. 

No airbase has just one hangar, and no other buildings. 

And if the hangar itself was restricted, where is it? It’s not even visible from the gate. 

Chances are that this restricted area would not have a publicly acknowledged numerical designation at all.  

It would simply say,  “Restricted Area – Government Property”.   

Okay, my nitpicking aside… what about suspense?  

Why do you have to tell us where we are?  

Why not just have it be some undisclosed location in the desert?  

Surprise me. Lord knows, you’ve given away enough stuff in the trailer.

But now we have our first spark of hope. We have bad guys. 

Or at least we think they are, because they just shot a handful of U.S. servicemen. And we pull up to the “one” hangar and we open the trunk to reveal – Ta dah! Indiana Jones!  

Why is he in the trunk? 

 He doesn’t look cool.  He looks old.  And he’s already been captured… without a fight… at least not one we saw. 

But wait, he’s got a friend!  And it’s someone cool… but this guy is acting like an idiot. And we see that the “heavy” who just shot a bunch of people, isn’t the main bad guy… who can it be?  

A hot girl, perhaps? Yep, it’s Cate Blanchett! Proving that her Kate Hepburn accent was a fluke! But she still looks good! Black wigs on hot blonds have been working since Bardot in ’63, and it doesn’t fail here. Plus, she’s mean, right? 

I mean, she’s wearing a sword. That makes her look mean, right?  

No. It makes her look like a Musketeer. Or maybe a Mouse-keteer… either way, twenty eight years ago, Indiana Jones proved how useless a sword was against the might of his revolver, and his wit.  

So why are we seeing a modern bad guy with a sword?  

Don’t worry, you’ll see later. Can you feel the suspense building yet? Yeah, me neither.  

But wait, she says she’s clairvoyant. She’s going to read Indy’s mind! Not this time, doll!  He’s got a mind like a steel trap! That’s the last time you try that gag!  No. Really. That’s the last time she tries that gag. 

So maybe she’s not clairvoyant…but she still has that sword!

So now we find out what she’s looking for…oh, wait we already knew when we got to the gate for “Hangar” 51. She’s looking for an alien that fell from the sky ten years ago.  She says Indy was a consultant brought in to research something that fell from the sky? 

All of his digging experience, years of studying mummified human remains, will no doubt be of immeasurable use on something inhuman that was alive yesterday and was never buried…no, really, this guy’s that good. Go, Indy!  Not only that, but he gets to do this cool trick with gunpowder and shotgun shot.  

I know. I know…suspension of disbelief. But, really?  

Gunpowder fights gravity to be pulled towards this thing, and yet the nails in the crate right next to it are still perfectly sunk into the wood, after years of this proximity?

The Ark burned through the Nazi symbol on its wooden crate in one night, but this things been in a box for ten years and hasn’t dislodged a screw from two inches away?  

Plus, you have to be the guy carrying the gun/sword two feet from it to have any difficulty handling your weapon?  

Because that’s how magnets work.  And oh, yeah, I forgot to mention it’s an alien corpse that provides this enormous magnetic field.  I tried to avoid mentioning that any sooner. I don’t want to give away the ending with the aliens... unlike the director. After all this is an Archaeology movie, right?  

So it’s all going to be a hoax that will turn out to be something really cool, right?  

Don’t hold your breath. 

You’ve got two hours until you reach complete disappointment.


So then we get Indy angry, and he takes a gun! And he gives it to his buddy! But wait!  The cool guy who babbles a lot…you mean he’s “bad”? 

But Indy only gets betrayed by women. All the other bad men are always bad. And the girls always regret it.  

Who does this guy think he is? Ray Winstone? Yes. He thinks he’s Ray Winstone.  He is mistaken. Ray Winstone is better than this. I’ve seen The Proposition, Ray.  You’re better than this.  

But don’t worry, folks, Indy can still get out of this in a really exciting way. Like finding a rocket-chair test facility, and holding on with the “heavy” as they speed through the night towards infinity… or at least toward the slow-down pool that doesn’t cause them to be thrown clear despite the fact that neither of them are strapped to anything. In fact, they both just get off and stumble away without seeming too affected. Then of course he is able to walk unseen through the open desert, hunted by several people in cars with lights, until the next morning when he comes to a small quiet town. But it’s only quiet, because all the people are dummies.  

At this point, I’m beginning to wonder if that doesn’t include our hero. 

Then we hear the loud speaker announce the one minute remaining until they test-drop a nuclear bomb on this town. 

Which of course makes me wonder, what the point of this warning could be? To whom are they talking?   

Wouldn’t they want the warning to be, on the short side, at least ten minutes?  

You know, because a minute is really not very much time to outrun a nuclear explosion, right?  

Unless, of course, you’re Keanu Reeves. 

And Indy definitely would have heard a ten minute warning as he was wandering aimlessly through the town, right?  

But okay, Steven, you’re setting up a gag, so let’s see it through.  

Indy’s going to, in the 60 seconds he has, remember that refrigerators are lead lined and radiation won’t penetrate lead, find one, show us the tag showing the lead content, empty it, climb inside, and start praying, so… let’s gloss over the fact that lead may be a brilliant deterrent for radiation, but not necessarily for a five megaton blast from, say, one mile away. Yeah, let’s just skip that “lead has a low boiling point” bit and cut to a still-shiny, white-washed (it’s a lead-based paint after all) refrigerator hurtling through the air, the lone surviving lead-lined refrigerator in a town full of kitchens. And what happens when it comes to a stop in the sand, five miles from its original divots in the now-melted linoleum?  

Indy opens the door and who is there staring back at him?  

Kenny Loggins’ friends!  

That’s right folks, even Steven Spielberg can write an animal slapstick gag!  Oh, wait, he already proved that with Jaws.


But let’s take a step back and look at the bigger picture.  

What’s really wrong with this, from a formulaic standpoint?  

In each of the previous movies, there was an archaeological event that was unrelated to the main storyline. 

Even though the second one had us picking up after the actual archaeological recovery, there was still the ashes of an eons-old Chinese guy, Indy dug up. It may have been implied, but it was still Archaeology.  

This wasn’t. Sifting through a warehouse (excuse me, Steven, a “hangar”) to find a box labeled “Alien” is not Archaeology. There’s no digging. There’s no human remains, or glowing trinkets, unearthed after thousands of years. There are, instead, aliens. And don’t expect this to be a ruse, folks. That’s what we get for the whole movie. 

The other films’ opening reels were designed to introduce us to Indy and how he could get out of tough situations using only his ingenuity and a whip.  

Of the first two and only two times (unless I couldn’t see the other times through my tears) we see him use the whip in this movie, it only works once.  

This is not “good use” of a trademark move, Mr. Spielberg

Granted, he does escape with the ingenious idea of hiding in a refrigerator. But I don’t think he’s cool for doing so. He outruns a giant boulder in Raiders. That’s cool!  

In Temple when he runs behind a rolling gong to avoid getting shot by machine guns… that’s cool. When he grabs onto the water spout of the railroad tower to kick the bad guy in front of him and spin round to a car further back on the train, in Crusade… that’s cool.  

Hiding in a refrigerator and talking to prairie dogs… not cool.  

In none of the other movies are we brought face to face with the main bad guys in the opening scene. Even if you count Belloq in the first movie, the Nazis were the real bad guys of that movie. Anyone watching a Steven Spielberg movie knows that Nazis are the real bad guys. 

But the point is that the opening bit is supposed to be stand-alone. It should be unrelated to the crux of the film. But we will meet no new bad people in this film.  


So now we have the aftermath scene where Indy is debriefed by the CIA spooks.  These are intelligence men, right? 

So why is the janitor from Scrubs cast in a role requiring credibility (at least in the context of the film)? Everybody knows this guy, and for him to have a role where he takes himself seriously when nobody else in the film seems to, is just plain dumb.  

Sorry, Neil Flynn, but you and Ray Winstone should have traded roles in this movie. I probably would have believed both characters more. These CIA agents get upset because this “Jones” person may have jeopardized national security by letting the commies have the alien.  

This scene fails for several reasons.  

First they overuse the “we can’t really talk about what we are talking about” bit.  

Then we have intelligence men who don’t know that Indy was in the OSS until he mentions it. The CIA came from the OSS. They claim to be an intelligence agency.  Wouldn’t their records have carried over? 

This seems pretty bush-league. Even for the CIA. Sorry, Langley, but as you can see, no one is safe from my wrath in this movie.  

So it takes some random General to waltz in and save the day by convincing the agents that Indy is one of the good guys. He doesn’t completely convince them, though. They still seem pretty skeptical. So why is this general even in the room? 

If he is supposed to be a credible character witness, then why is his information being ignored?  And who the heck is this guy 

I’ve never seen him before.  Will we ever see him again? 

He seems to be pretty close to Indy. Maybe he could join the rest of the old fogeys and help fight the not-so-bad guys. 

Nope, he’s done. No mention of his character ever again. But he’s in good company.  We never see the CIA again, either....  Ever. They seemed pretty peeved.  

You would think they would at least follow him around. Is he no longer suspect?  

When he comes back from the jungle with nothing to show, do they care? 

Nope, he just goes on with his life. We never have a resolution for this scene. 

Why not?  Isn’t the government an important player in this anti-Communist “Cold War” movie? 

Why is this scene in this movie?  To find out that Indy was in the OSS?  Who cares?  

I cannot answer any of those questions.


Next, we have the classroom scene.  

This should be the standard “young girls think Indy’s hot” scene that we love in the first and third movies. But unfortunately, again, we have another purposeless scene.   We have Indy getting yelled at by the Dean, who is played, unconvincingly, by Oscar-winner, Jim Broadbent

Indy is fired because of the government. And this Dean, in a show of solidarity, quits.  Who cares? I’ve never seen this character before in all my life!  

First he’s yelling at our hero, then they are sharing a drink? What just happened?  What does it all mean?  

Why does my head hurt?  

I asked my friend if he could divine a valid reason for this scene.  

His guess was that they had originally written this part for Denholm Elliot

However, knowing he had died fifteen years ago, can this possibly be true?  

And if it were true, then why not have Broadbent simply play the Elliot character?  

No, apparently, Elliot’s memory is too sacred. So instead, we hire an award-winning actor to show that Indy can still make friends after Denholm Elliot dies. 

But just to make absolutely sure we don’t confuse Broadbent with Elliot, we are bombarded with an onslaught of memorial materials: a painting, a photo, and a statue of Elliot’s character, and ONE headshot/production-still from the third movie (?) of Sean Connery!  

All of this to remind us that it has taken so long to make another one of these movies that the comic relief of the good movies is either unable or unwilling to appear in this film. Pointless.


Now we are introduced to the real reason this film was made.  

We meet Indiana Jones’ son. 

Oh, sorry, we’re not supposed to know that yet.  

I’m sorry, but that had to be the worst kept secret in “movies” since, I don’t know, maybe since Sean Connery was cast to play Indy’s father. But, you know what?  

That didn’t ruin the third movie, why should it ruin this one, right? Wrong.  

The actor playing the character was a surprise. We didn’t meet Connery, only to find out two hours later he was Indy’s dad.  We just don’t see him until halfway though. So it doesn’t affect how the movie’s plot twists work. We aren’t surprised to learn Indy had a father. We know he’s got a father. 

But we are supposed to be surprised he has a son. But it seems that the only person surprised by this information during the two hour running time of the film, was Indiana Jones. Not so witty, Indy.  

We are introduced to Shia’s character as he rides up and down a railroad platform on a Harley looking for Indy.  

Let’s begin with the fashion statement.  

It’s not even an homage. It’s probably the actual costume worn by Marlon Brando in The Wild One. It’s probably also the same bike.  

And then there’s the name. “Mutt”.  

Anyone who doesn’t get the reference to Indy being named after the dog was asleep at this point in the movie… which wouldn’t be too hard to believe. 

He even reiterates it by saying, “It’s the name I chose.”  

Just like Indiana chose to name himself after a dog.  

Hi, I’m irony. I play no part in this film

He says his mother, Mary/Marion (I’m a little fuzzy as to whether or not he says her full name… we know who she is, badly kept secret, remember) has been kidnapped.  Okay, we get it, he’s Indy’s and Marion’s son. I saw the previews. I know already. 

Somebody nudge Jones. I think he’s asleep, like half the audience. Nope. Not yet. He has to wait another hour to find out. He is completely oblivious. Not cool, Indy. Not cool. 

Oh yeah, and there’s some other guy, we’ve never heard of who happens to be a close friend of Indy from “who knows when”… who the kid also knows… who is missing as well. Cue the travel? 

Not so fast. Indy notices they’re being followed. But by whom? Indy boldly guesses the CIA. Why would you even think that? We aren’t going to see them again! They were the red herring!  Didn’t you read the script?  

Okay, so it’s the Russkies following them. Seeing the “bad” guys can only mean one thing. It’s time for a fight and a chase. And that’s what we get. A fight and a chase.  

Hey, I’ve got an idea!  Let’s bring a “crew-cuts” vs. the “greasers” to evoke some Francis Ford Coppola. He’s “our” friend, and can’t make a good movie anymore, so let’s remind people of the last time he did make a good one. After all, it is the fifties. 

Now some fun stunts on a motorcycle to show it’s not just there to evoke Brando… it’s also functional. But Indy’s not driving the cycle, he’s just a passenger. No whip. No gun. Just along for the ride. Still not cool, Indy.  

Then we get on a plane to South America to rescue “Mutt’s” mom… oh yeah, and that guy we’ve never heard of, who happens to be connecting Indy to the kid.  

We have the obligatory red line moving over a map, which gets everyone ready for a cool location shot somewhere in South America that only a few people in the audience are likely to have been… but, not so fast “movie goers”.  

I probably forgot to mention that there are no location shoots in this movie.  

Excuse me, I’m mistaken. The college campus scenes were filmed on a real ivy-league campus. So for those of you who can’t drive to New Haven, you actually get to see Yale. Bully! 

But the jungle sequences and anything else resembling the outdoors are not. 

In fact, the whole thing was shot in such bad blue/green screen, that the whole thing might as well have been a cartoon.  

This may be the only thing that redeems any of the acting in this movie. 

The fact that there were probably just five or six people in a big green room screaming at each other with nothing else to react to may make their contribution seem bigger, but it stripped away everything was supposed to deliver.  

Exotic locations were one of top three reasons to go see an Indy film.  

We get to actually see someplace cool that we can’t afford to take a trip to anytime we feel like it.  In the first movie they filmed on location in North Africa.   

In the second movie, they went to South Asia.  

In the third movie they filmed in Petra!  Or at least they filmed the front gate of Petra.  

That is just a given in an Indiana Jones movie. They have more money to make this movie than they had to make the first, so why skimp on shooting in faraway locale?  Besides, it’s got to be cheaper to film in South America than in L.A.  Why do you think all the TV shows are shot in Canada now? Did you guys at least go to Canada? And the outdoors shots always have some weird purple sunset or some other wholly unnatural colored sky.  

The whole thing just looked fake. If there were indeed location shots, they were digitally altered past the point of recognition. And if you’re going to skimp on travel costs, why not put the money into better effects?

The miniature effects shots in the second movie were more convincing than the color of the sky in this movie. Twenty years later and now you’re screwing up color palettes?  What’s wrong with you guys?  


PART TWO COMING SOON

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

NEW RELEASES - JUNE 10

Alfie Darling (1975)

American Crude

Ballad of Narayam (Japanese)

Bob Dylan 1978-1989: Both Ends of the Rainbow

The Bucket List

Company: A Musical Comedy

Countdown to Wednesday (Documentary 2003)

Day of the Outlaw (1959)

Funny Games (American version)

The Grand (2007)

Gunfight at Dodge City 

Jumper

The List

Making Of (Tunisia 2006)

Navajo Joe

Organizm

The Other Boleyn Girl

Otis

Out of the Blue (2006)

Player 5150

Red Room 2 (Japanese)

Rock the Paint (2005)

The Signal

Sidekick

Sex-Hungry MILFs (Documentary?)

Summer '04 (German)

The Way West

The Westerner

Wieners

Witless Protection

You Belong to Me


SPECIAL EDITIONS:

Bridge on the River Kwai (2 Disc Special Edition)

Catherine Deveuve 5 Film Collection (Manon 70 * Le Sauvage * Hotel Des Ameriques  * Le Choc * Fort Saganne) 

Icons of Adventure  (The Pirates of Blood River * The Devil-Ship Pirates * The Stranglers of Bombay * The Terror of the Tongs)

Lawrence of Arabia (2 Disc Special Edition)

Zapped/Making the Grade (Double Horney Double feathure)


TELEVISION:

Army Wives Season 1

The Boondocks Season 2

City of Vice Season 1 (BBC)

Dukes of Hazzard - Reunion/ Hazzards in Hollywood

Fantastic 4: World's Greatest Heroes Season 1

Get Smart Complete Series 

John Adams - Complete Miniseries

Odd Couple Season 4

Rescue Me Season 4


BLU-RAY:

Lara Croft: Tomb Raider


REPLACEMENTS / CUSTOMER REQUESTS/ NEW TO STORE:

Back Door to Hell (1965) 

Freak (1999)

The Master (Hong Kong 1980)

Midnight Blue Vol. 4: Freaks and Geeks 

The Noah

Tremors 2: Aftershocks

Tremors 3: Back to Perfection

Wild America

Thursday, June 5, 2008

SEXING UP THE BLOG - CONTEST

If I had to say what "my type" is ....

(I was experimenting with a photo editing thing and got carried away)

Free rental to anyone who can identify everyone in these pics
Post your answer in the comments section.
Here are some clues (click for a larger view)
- One woman is (oops) pictured twice.
- Two are known as singers
All but one of these woman have appeared in a number of films
- One is more famous as a model (but she has done about a dozen films, foreign ones that didn't get much play here. And she won a 'Bambi' award - whatever that is). 
- One is Oscar winner
- One was on a episode of The Six Million Dollar Man 
- One was on an episode of Crime Story
- Three have done movies with Brando
- Seven out of these sixteen women are American (born)
Um, I think.

-sweeneyrules

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

CREEPY FREE

I could not imagine watching a movie on my IPod ("Honey, I downloaded The Bridge On The River Kwai, for our return flight").

 I don’t even get into watching flicks on my computer. I don’t have a very big screen. However I have caught some South Park episodes I had missed and I’ve watched some documentaries I couldn’t find on DVD (I don’t wanna download ‘em, just watch ‘em. This website Movies Found On Line has some good stuff). 

If it's suppose to look like a Youtube video then the handheld fake-documentary works on my small screen as well. 


I recently watched George Romero’s latest zombie soap-opera Diary Of The Dead on line for free (I forget where I found it, but vidserp.com is a place to start).

I kinda enjoyed the new one. It’s nothing great, I barely remember it now.  It was a big improvement over Romero’s last one, that lame-ass Land Of The Dead. Hey it was free, maybe had I gone and seen it in the theater or even rented it, I might of been pissed off, on the laptop, it was watchable. 

It’s another of the Blair Witch Project/ Cloverfield fake documentaries. Though it might hold up even less then those two in the ‘actors believably holding the camera’ department.


Going back to Spinal Tap or Man Bites Dog (or The (British) Office TV series etc.) I’m a sucker for the genre, I think the style can bring a realism to horror flicks that can often feel to slick and glossy for me.  Matt Barone of Good Magazine calls them “Handheld Horror Movies.


Speaking of which, I found on Google video a perfectly watchable copy of the Spanish fake-doc/zombie flick [REC] (as in ‘record’). This flick was scary, it had me stressed with tension and dread. It stars the very adorable Manuela Velasco (from Pedro Almodóvar’s Law Of Desire) as a TV reporter following a firefighter crew around for the night. They all get stuck in a Quarantined building that seems to have a  dangerous virus attacking the residents (here’s a better summery and a rave review by Philip French of The Observer).

Director Jaume Balagueró also made the flawed but creepy flick The Nameless (1999). Rocket just got it on DVD. It’s frustrating because the idea and atmosphere of are interesting, a desperate Mother gets a phone call from her long dead daughter and go on a quest to find her, taking her into the twisted world of Nazi religious cults, perversions of science and child molesting freaks and other assorted nastiness. Unfortunately it’s kinda bogged down by people always stopping to explain load of information to the mother and her retired cop partner. It also uses this cheap (Ring style) noise and static in the scene cuts to make up for a lack of real scares.  


But [REC] is definitely worth checking out on line (for free), because I’ve heard no mention of it opening up here or coming out on DVD, There’s already an american remake in the works (slated to hit theaters in October) called Quarantine directed by 

John Erick Dowdle who directed another fake-horror-doc I wouldn't mind checking-out called The Poughkeepsie Tapes, I saw previews for it last year but it never opened.

 

I’m also hoping to find a bootleg of the Slamdance fake-horror-doc Paranormal Activity that got some “"it will scare the pants off you" reviews

Twitch.com reported Dreamworks bought it, but appear to not want to release it.

Oh goody, they just to remake it.


-sweeneyrules

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

NEW RELEASES - JUNE 3 2008

Boarding Gate  *  Control  *  Destroy all Monsters  *  The Evil Woods  *  The Eye  *  

An Eye for an Eye  *  Flawless  *  Gamera: Guardian of the Universe  *  

I Wanna Be a Beauty Queen (1980)  *  Mama’s Boy  *  Meet the Spartans  *  

The Onion Movie  *  Rape is a Circle  *  Remember the Daze  *  Semi-Pro  *  

Shark Swarm  *  Stump the Band  *  Surviving Eden  *  

Twisted: A Balloonamentary  *  Vince Vaughn's Wild West Comedy Show


SPECIAL EDITIONS / BOX SETS:


Dirty Harry Ultimate Collector's Edition: Dirty Harry (1971) * Magnum Force (1973) 

* The Enforcer (1976) * Sudden Impact (1983) * Dead Pool (1988) 

Diva  (The Meridian Collection 1981) 

Harry Langdon Double Feature:  Three's a Crowd  (1927) * The Chaser (1928)

Neighbors (1971 Play)

Stan Laurel Collection: Volume 2

Students Bodies: All Night Movies:  The Harrad Experiment (1973) * Seniors (1978) 

* Getting Wasted (1980) * Secrets of Sweet Sixteen (1981) 

The Thief of Bagdad (Criterion)


TELEVISION:

The Dead Zone Season 6

The Incredible Hulk Season 3

The Incredible Hulk Season 4

Ironside Season 1 Volume 1

Mannix Season 1

Weeds Season 3


REPLACEMENT DVDS:

Career Opportunities

Children of the Corn

Evita

Sunday, June 1, 2008

The Next Director Shelf - VOTING EXTENDED!



As you may or may not recall from this post:

http://rocketvideo.blogspot.com/2008/05/next-director-shelf-you-decide.html


myself and sweeneyrules have been busy rearranging sections of the store, and we've found space to add some new director shelves. (why are we rearranging the store? well mostly because neither of us really have anything better to do, and its oddly therapeutic. also we like the confused look on your face when you get to where the Japanese section was yesterday, and now it's somewhere else.)

anyway, since people are always asking how we decide who gets a shelf and are generally either confused or irritated by our reasoning, we thought we'd let YOU decide this time. so we set up a neat little pole with a bunch of possible candidates. the voting was a little slow at first, but now it's starting to pick up.

good old HOWARD HAWKS is currently in the lead with 10 votes! not far behind are HAL ASHBY and MICHAEL MANN, each with 5. trailing a single vote behind are SPIKE LEE and TERRY GILLIAM each with 4. OTTO PREMINGER currently has 3 along with WILLIAM WYLER. still toward the bottom we have RIDLEY SCOTT and PETER BOGDANOVICH each with 1. and last we have poor WILLIAM FRIEDKIN with NO VOTES!

our original cutoff for the voting was today, june 1st, but as you have no doubt gathered from the title of this post, we are extending the poll. let's say, oh, another 2 weeks or so? we promise not to extend it beyond that. also by that time we'll see if we can squeeze out some extra space and we will throw up another round of directors...

so keep the votes coming,
and for *%&#sake, someone vote for FRIEDKIN!!
-BP





Which Director should have a shelf next at Rocket Video?

Hal Ashby
Peter Bogdanovich
William Friedkin
Terry Gilliam
Howard Hawks
Spike Lee
Michael Mann
Otto Preminger
Ridley Scott
William Wyler



(View Results)

Create a Poll